Showing posts with label Information Technology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Information Technology. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

Indians are 10th most intense internet searchers in Asia Pacific

An Indian netizen is hitting the search button on an average 51 times during a month, but this puts them only at the last position among the top 10 countries of Asia-Pacific in terms of intensity of online search.
According to the latest ranking of top internet search figures for Asia-Pacific released by internet traffic tracking firm comScore, Koreans have topped in terms of online search intensity with an average of 102.8 searches per searcher during the month of July.
“Searchers in Korea exhibited the heaviest search intensity with an average of 102.8 searches per searcher during the month, followed by Australia (102 searches per searcher) and Japan (100.8 searches per searcher),” comScore said.
India has ranked after Korea, Australia, Japan, Singapore (91.2), New Zealand (87.2), Hong Kong (81), China (76.6), Taiwan (74.8) and Malaysia (64.2) on search intensity ranking.
India’s score of 51 searches per searcher is even lower than the overall average of 80.7 for the Asia-Pacific region.
However, the figures might increase after taking into account traffic from the public computers. The comScore data has been compiled by taking into account all unique internet users aged 15 and above from their home and work computers and it excludes searches from public computers such as Internet cafes or access from mobile phones or PDAs.
However, India fares much better in terms of the number of people searching something on internet as well as in terms of the number of such searches.

Source: livemint.com

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

Google Strikes Again !

-contributed by Ankit

Google is best known for two reasons. Firstly because they have an uncanny ability to come up with totally new and innovative products such as Google Earth which none of its competitors would have even contemplated about.
Secondly because they are motivated enough to come up with much more efficient replacements of existing successful products and solutions of their competitors. Before the Google Search Engine became the world's most popularly used search engine, MSN and Yahoo were the leading players. Due to much improved search algorithms and faster search results, Google left them way behind. Google captures more than 65% of the search engine market whereas Yahoo has a market share of 20% and Microsoft has a meagre 7%.

Chrome, the latest offering from the R&D labs of Google is a web browser giving direct competition to Microsoft's Internet Explorer and the very successful Mozilla Firefox. Currently Internet Explorer is used by 70 % of the Internet users and Mozilla has a market share of 20%. Mozilla has been growing at a steady rate in last few years, mainly at the cost of Microsoft IE. The major reason for the huge market share of Microsoft Internet Explorer is the fact that it comes bundled with the Microsoft Windows. Google clearly saw an opportunity here as there would be millions of people who would easily change over to another browser, provided it is easily available. Google on the day of launch of Chrome, displayed the download link on the main page of Google search, giving it a huge publicity infront of millions of Google users.

Using Chrome is a refreshing experience purely because of a new look and feel which it provides. Performance wise too, it is doing pretty well. It works much faster than the IE and Firefox and takes lesser memory compared to them. Chrome seems to work fine with over 25 tabs open too. The homepage with thumbnail images of frequently visited sites makes your work faster and the history search is as efficient and comprehensive as the Google search itself.
Its not possible that there will only be the positive side of the Chrome. There have been a few of instances in last 2-3 days when I had to "kill" a webpage because it wasn't responding, but the good thing is that, a crash in one tab does not crash the whole browser.

Google Chrome will definitely eat up a huge chunk of Microsoft IE users in near future. With Google going aggressive with Android, the mobile phone OS, the launch of Google OS for computers seems to be pretty close. And that definitely would be some competition for Microsoft!!

Monday, September 8, 2008

One Laptop Per Child

Your independent source for news, information, commentary, and discussion of One Laptop Per Child's "$100 laptop" computer, the OLPC Children's Machine XO, developed by MIT Media Lab co-founder Nicholas Negroponte.

Retail Sales of CDMA-connected XO Laptops in India!

Tucked away in Deepshikha Monga's short article, "OLPC looks to World Bank for India funding" is a XO laptop bombshell:

Later this year, the XO laptops are expected to hit the retail stores. Sources say Reliance Communications, which partnered OLPC Foundation to conduct an XO pilot project inMaharashtra last year, is looking at retailing these laptops bundled with its CDMA modems. Might this be the reason for Nicholas Negroponte's visit to India in August for OLPC India Day? Regardless, it would be a shocking yet welcomed shift in strategy for One Laptop Per Child.

Instead of relying on the slow, arduous, and mostly unsuccessful governmental sales process, India's Reliance Communications has the right idea: Sell XO laptops directly to parents and the public.

Just look at last year's G1G1 success - OLPC "sold" 165,000 XO laptops in less than 6 weeks by skipping school systems and selling directly to eager American and Canadian buyers. Imagine the demand for an XO that has mesh networkingand CDMA connectivity! I know I'd be first in line for a truly mobile XO.

But before we get geek lust going, I have to echo Marc Valentin's questions:

Which part of it is true ?
- XO laptops will be really available in retail stores in India?
- It will be bundled with a Reliance CDMA modem?

If this is true, which operating system will be used? Linux or XP? Or maybe dual boot?

Let's be honest though, I'll be wondering these questions as I book a flight to Mumbai for a bit of line squatting.

Source: olpcnews

HP's Personal Touch

The all-in-one TouchSmart computer lets your fingers pick up where the mouse leaves off

A couple of decades ago, all the big personal computer makers except Apple (AAPL) ceded the development of software to Microsoft (MSFT). The inevitable result was that PCs became commodities, running identical programs on nearly identical hardware. Manufacturers are now fighting this trend, none more so than Hewlett-Packard (HPQ). Its ad slogan asserts that "the computer is personal again." The TouchSmart IQ506 shows HP means business.

The TouchSmart is an all-in-one computer like Apple's iMac, with a 22-inch touch-sensitive display. I was not terribly impressed by the first TouchSmart when it came out early last year. But the new model is better looking, about $500 cheaper at $1,299, and perhaps most important, has considerably better touch software.

Actually, there are two sets of programs available: the standard Windows environment and HP's touch-control applications. To get to the latter, you tap a "TouchSmart" icon on your desktop, which calls up two rows of "tiles." The large ones in the top row are for touch-controlled applications HP thinks you will use frequently, including media players, a picture manager, a novel family bulletin board, and a calendar. The lower row is mostly standard Windows applications, but you can edit the list to add or remove programs or move them between rows by dragging them.

A common mistake in the design of touch interfaces is to treat the human finger as though it were some sort of mouse. HP's TouchSmart programs are different. They dispense with cursors and scroll bars —when you can put your finger directly on the screen you don't need a cursor to tell you where you are pointing. To move an object, you touch it with a finger and drag it to its new location. Sliding your finger up and down or sideways smoothly scrolls the display, while a quick flick of the finger results in a fast scroll. Alas, the resemblance to Apple's iPhone stops short of the ability to resize images by pinching or stretching them.

As long as you're using HP's TouchSmart applications, this computer delivers on its promises. The music player displays your albums either in a rectangular grid or a circular arrangement, and you browse through them by swiping a finger across the screen. Tapping an album cover shows its contents, and you create play lists by dragging and dropping tracks. But there's no integrated music store, and if you switch to Apple's iTunes, you lose the special touchscreen features.

The photo application automatically gathers all the pictures on your hard drive. (Oddly, that included the album cover art from my music collection.) The program includes some very basic editing tools and, of course, the opportunity to upload pictures to HP's Snapfish print service.

HP assumes the TouchSmart will be a shared family computer. So it provides a handy "notes" application based on a Post-it Notes metaphor. You can share typed, handwritten, or even voice notes, which you create simply by speaking within range of the TouchSmart's microphone.

Once you leave the special TouchSmart programs, you are back in the world of ordinary applications for the Windows desktop, where touch becomes just a mouse substitute. The effect is vaguely disconcerting, though HP does include a touch-enhanced version of Internet Explorer with extra-large scroll bars and buttons. It also provides a wireless mouse and keyboard for when you're working in Windows mode.

The user interface based on mice, windows, and icons has been with us for a quarter century, and while it has served us well, technologies such as touch are creating new possibilities. There is only so much that computer manufacturers dependent on Windows can do, but it's good to see a company such as HP getting back into the game and trying out innovations where Microsoft fails to tread.



Source: Businessweek